There are some codes of ethics which drug companies had to follow while marketing their products in the market. But according to a report provided by "US PIRG" the real picture is that "drug companies are marketing the latest, most expensive drugs by offering expensive gifts to doctors- and result is over-prescription of the newest drugs. Clearly these marketing efforts do not rely solely on scientific research and medical benefits.
This over-prescribing causes three problems for consumers.
- First, these drugs are the most expensive for consumers – who end up paying twice, as they ultimately pay for the gifts given to doctors as well.
- Second, because the newest drugs have been on the market for a shorter time than the older ones, they are among the least-tested, with potentially unknown side effects.
- Finally, drug company marketing to doctors damages the exclusivity of the doctor-patient relationship, as drug marketers shoulder their way into the consulting room.
Currently, drug companies are allowed to set their own standards for their marketing to doctors. They are required by California’s Senate Bill 1765, however, to adopt a limit on the total value of the gifts they can give to a particular doctor in a given year, and post this information to their web sites.
This white paper examines the rules the drug companies have set for themselves, assesses whether they comply with the minimum requirements of SB 1765, and identifies aspects of the drug company rules that are deeply problematic. Among our findings:
-Drug companies fail to count some meals and other payments as “gifts,” and therefore not subject to the limit;
-Some companies reserve the right to exceed their limits if they so choose;
-Others assert that they are following a limit, but do not disclose what that limit actually is, while a few fail even to post their policies at all.
It is clear that drug companies cannot be trusted to actually protect consumers through voluntary restrictions on their direct-to-doctor marketing. By playing by their own rules, the manufacturers have created limits that in many cases fail to constrain their actions at all. Fortunately, there are common-sense policies that will restrain direct-to-doctor marketing to an appropriate scope. These include:
-Putting in place hard, enforceable limits on per-doctor gifts;
-Publicly disclosing all gift and non-gift payments;
-Encouraging access to disinterested, third-party informational resources on drug safety and efficacy.
Playing by Their Own Rules
Download the pdf version of full report.
Quotes are a way of giving ourselves motivation and encouragement. Here are some motivational quotes, which may give you an understanding...
With the symptoms of a stiff painful neck, my shoulder pain was getting severe with tingling and numbness feeling in my arms. I was feeling ...
There is no scientific or medical study regarding the harmful or good effects of drinking ice cold water, but in alternative therapies like ...
I read a lot and although I didn't study psychology as a subject at college, but I like to read and learn about self help, self improvem...
There are many reasons behind selection of organic or natural products. There is no exception when it comes to milk and milk products. It is...
Auricular therapy (Acupressure therapy of the ear region) has been used successfully for Smoking cessation. Auriculotherapy is thought to be...
Tongue twisters are the words or phrases in repeated manner for the practice of specific letters or sounds. These tongue exercises are meant...
Definition of net addiction: Internet addiction is currently classified by mental health professionals as an Obsessive Compulsive Disorde...